Wilde Trials - Revision history

Pankratz at 10:39, 28 October 2011

2011-10-28T10:39:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 28 October 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	While in an earlier age the “sodomist” had been regarded as a perpetrator of specific, sinful acts, a development in late Victorian pathology saw homosexuality as a new form of criminal degeneracy. According to Michel Foucault, the homosexual male, a deviant individual, emerged as “a type of life, a life form.”		While in an earlier age the “sodomist” had been regarded as a perpetrator of specific, sinful acts, a development in late Victorian pathology saw homosexuality as a new form of criminal degeneracy. According to Michel Foucault, the homosexual male, a deviant individual, emerged as “a type of life, a life form.”
	At the time of the trials, Wilde's homosexuality was an open secret among his contemporaries. This was one significant reason for his treatment as a very controversial public figure. Yet, as a writer he was at the height of his success.		At the time of the trials, Wilde's homosexuality was an open secret among his contemporaries. This was one significant reason for his treatment as a very controversial public figure. Yet, as a writer he was at the height of his success.
	It was Wilde's affair with [[Lord Alfred Douglas]] that triggered the 1895 court trial. Douglas' father, the Marquess of Queensberry, publically accused Wilde, in distinctly inarticulate terms, of 'posing as a Somdomite'(sic). On hearing this, Wilde allegedly wrote to a friend that “my whole life seems ruined by this man.” Wilde proceeded to sue Queensberry for libel.		It was Wilde's affair with [[Lord Alfred Douglas]] that triggered the 1895 court trial. Douglas' father, the Marquess of Queensberry, publically accused Wilde, in distinctly inarticulate terms, of "posing as a Somdomite" (sic). On hearing this, Wilde allegedly wrote to a friend that “my whole life seems ruined by this man.” [please give source] Wilde proceeded to sue Queensberry for libel.

	'''The Trials'''		'''The Trials'''

	The first trial, the libel trial against ~~Queesnberry~~, took place between ~~the 3rd~~ and ~~5th of~~ April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.		The first trial, the libel trial against Queensberry, took place between 3 and 5 April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.
	In the second trial, conducted from 26 April to 1 May 1895, Wilde was accused of “indecency.” Due to Wilde's own ~~rhetoric~~ skill and his lawyer's efforts to cast doubt on the credibility of witnesses, the jury could not reach a definite decision and a third trial became necessary. Wilde was urged by friends to leave the country in the interval between the ~~2nd~~ and ~~3rd~~ trials but he refused to do so.		In the second trial, conducted from 26 April to 1 May 1895, Wilde was accused of “indecency.” Due to Wilde's own rhetorical skill and his lawyer's efforts to cast doubt on the credibility of witnesses, the jury could not reach a definite decision and a third trial became necessary. Wilde was urged by friends to leave the country in the interval between the second and third trials but he refused to do so.
	The third and last trial took place from 20 May to 25 May 1895. Under a new prosecutor, it ended with Wilde's conviction for “gross indecency” by the commission of acts of indecency in private with members of his own sex. He was convicted to 2 years of imprisonment and hard labor in Reading Goal.
			The third and last trial took place from 20 May to 25 May 1895. Under a new prosecutor, it ended with Wilde's conviction for “gross indecency” by the commission of acts of indecency in private with members of his own sex. He was convicted to two years of imprisonment and hard labor in Reading Goal.

	In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.		In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.

	'''Public Response'''		'''Public Response'''

	After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. ''The Daily Telegraph'' expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurable vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. ''The London Evening News'' felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”		After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. ''The Daily Telegraph'' expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurable vanity,” [please give source for this quote] and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. ''The London Evening News'' felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.” [please give source for this quote]

	'''Aftermath'''		'''Aftermath'''

	Wilde was released from prison in 1897 as a broken man. He went to France where he called himself Sebastian Melmoth after the doomed title character of [[Charles Maturin]]'s novel ~~“Melmoth~~ the Wanderer.“		Wilde was released from prison in 1897 as a broken man. He went to France where he called himself Sebastian Melmoth after the doomed title character of [[Charles Maturin]]'s novel ''Melmoth the Wanderer''.

	In 1898, he published “The Ballad of Reading Goal.”		In 1898, he published “The Ballad of Reading Goal.”
	In 1905, 5 years after Wilde's death, a letter of deep reproach to Lord Alfred Douglas was published under the title “[[De Profundis]].“ This letter was originally written during his imprisonment.
			In 1905, five years after Wilde's death, a letter of deep reproach to Lord Alfred Douglas was published under the title “[[De Profundis]].“ This letter was originally written during his imprisonment.


Line 29:		Line 33:


	'''~~sources~~:'''		'''Sources:'''

	Arata, Stephen. ''Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siecle. Identity and Empire''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.		Arata, Stephen. ''Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siecle. Identity and Empire''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

Eleanor rigby at 10:54, 26 October 2011

2011-10-26T10:54:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 26 October 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	The first trial, the libel trial against Queesnberry, took place between the 3rd and 5th of April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.		The first trial, the libel trial against Queesnberry, took place between the 3rd and 5th of April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.
	In the second trial, conducted from 26 April to 1 May 1895, Wilde was accused of “indecency.” Due to Wilde's own rhetoric skill and his lawyer's efforts to ~~the~~ cast doubt on the credibility of witnesses, the jury could not reach a definite decision and a third trial became necessary. Wilde was urged by friends to leave the country in the interval between the 2nd and 3rd trials but he refused to do so.		In the second trial, conducted from 26 April to 1 May 1895, Wilde was accused of “indecency.” Due to Wilde's own rhetoric skill and his lawyer's efforts to cast doubt on the credibility of witnesses, the jury could not reach a definite decision and a third trial became necessary. Wilde was urged by friends to leave the country in the interval between the 2nd and 3rd trials but he refused to do so.
	The third and last trial took place from 20 May to 25 May 1895. Under a new prosecutor, it ended with Wilde's conviction for “gross indecency” by the commission of acts of indecency in private with members of his own sex. He was convicted to 2 years of imprisonment and hard labor in Reading Goal.		The third and last trial took place from 20 May to 25 May 1895. Under a new prosecutor, it ended with Wilde's conviction for “gross indecency” by the commission of acts of indecency in private with members of his own sex. He was convicted to 2 years of imprisonment and hard labor in Reading Goal.
	In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.		In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.
Line 17:		Line 17:
	'''Public Response'''		'''Public Response'''

	After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. The Daily Telegraph expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his ~~incurably~~ vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. The London Evening News felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”		After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. ''The Daily Telegraph'' expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurable vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. ''The London Evening News'' felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”

	'''Aftermath'''		'''Aftermath'''
Line 31:		Line 31:
	'''sources:'''		'''sources:'''

	Arata, Stephen. Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siecle. Identity and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.		Arata, Stephen. ''Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siecle. Identity and Empire''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

	Hyde, H. Montgomery. The Trials of Oscar Wilde. 1948. New York: Dover Publications, 1973. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.		Hyde, H. Montgomery. ''The Trials of Oscar Wilde''. 1948. New York: Dover Publications, 1973. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

	Ousby, Ian, ed. “Oscar Wilde.” The Wordsworth Companion to Literature in English. Wordsworth Reference. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1994.		Ousby, Ian, ed. “Oscar Wilde.” ''The Wordsworth Companion to Literature in English.'' Wordsworth Reference. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1994.

	Wilpers, Birgit. The Trials of Oscar Wilde. Seminar paper. GRIN Verlag, 2008. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.		Wilpers, Birgit. ''The Trials of Oscar Wilde''. Seminar paper. GRIN Verlag, 2008. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

Eleanor rigby at 10:44, 26 October 2011

2011-10-26T10:44:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 26 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Bailey]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.		A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Bailey]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.

	'''		'''Background'''
	Background'''

	Wilde's eventual conviction was supported by the 1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act which prohibited sexual relations between men. Prior to the 1885 Amendment, a 1533 statute outlawing “the detestable and abominable vice of buggery” backed the persecution of homosexuals.		Wilde's eventual conviction was supported by the 1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act which prohibited sexual relations between men. Prior to the 1885 Amendment, a 1533 statute outlawing “the detestable and abominable vice of buggery” backed the persecution of homosexuals.
	While in an earlier age the “sodomist” had been regarded as a perpetrator of specific, sinful acts, a development in late Victorian pathology saw homosexuality as a new form of criminal degeneracy. According to Michel Foucault, the homosexual male, a deviant individual, emerged as “a type of life, a life form.”		While in an earlier age the “sodomist” had been regarded as a perpetrator of specific, sinful acts, a development in late Victorian pathology saw homosexuality as a new form of criminal degeneracy. According to Michel Foucault, the homosexual male, a deviant individual, emerged as “a type of life, a life form.”
	At the time of the trials, Wilde's homosexuality was an open secret among his contemporaries. This was one significant reason for his treatment as a very controversial public figure. Yet, as a writer he was at the height of his success.		At the time of the trials, Wilde's homosexuality was an open secret among his contemporaries. This was one significant reason for his treatment as a very controversial public figure. Yet, as a writer he was at the height of his success.
	It was Wilde's affair with Lord Alfred Douglas that triggered the 1895 court trial. Douglas' father, the Marquess of Queensberry, publically accused Wilde, in distinctly inarticulate terms, of 'posing as a Somdomite'(sic). On hearing this, Wilde allegedly wrote to a friend that “my whole life seems ruined by this man.” Wilde proceeded to sue Queensberry for libel.		It was Wilde's affair with [[Lord Alfred Douglas]] that triggered the 1895 court trial. Douglas' father, the Marquess of Queensberry, publically accused Wilde, in distinctly inarticulate terms, of 'posing as a Somdomite'(sic). On hearing this, Wilde allegedly wrote to a friend that “my whole life seems ruined by this man.” Wilde proceeded to sue Queensberry for libel.

	'''		'''The Trials'''
	The Trials'''

	The first trial, the libel trial against Queesnberry, took place between the 3rd and 5th of April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.		The first trial, the libel trial against Queesnberry, took place between the 3rd and 5th of April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.
Line 17:		Line 15:
	In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.		In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.

	'''		'''Public Response'''
	Public Response'''

	After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. The Daily Telegraph expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurably vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. The London Evening News felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”		After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. The Daily Telegraph expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurably vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. The London Evening News felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”
Line 24:		Line 21:
	'''Aftermath'''		'''Aftermath'''

	Wilde was released from prison in 1897 as a broken man. He went to France where he called himself Sebastian Melmoth after the doomed title character of Charles Maturin's novel “Melmoth the Wanderer.“		Wilde was released from prison in 1897 as a broken man. He went to France where he called himself Sebastian Melmoth after the doomed title character of [[Charles Maturin]]'s novel “Melmoth the Wanderer.“
	In 1898, he published “The Ballad of Reading Goal.”		In 1898, he published “The Ballad of Reading Goal.”
	In 1905, 5 years after Wilde's death, a letter of deep reproach to Lord Alfred Douglas was published under the title ~~“De~~ Profundis.“ This letter was originally written during his imprisonment.		In 1905, 5 years after Wilde's death, a letter of deep reproach to Lord Alfred Douglas was published under the title “[[De Profundis]].“ This letter was originally written during his imprisonment.

Eleanor rigby at 10:41, 26 October 2011

2011-10-26T10:41:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 26 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Bailey]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.		A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Bailey]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.

			'''
			Background'''

			Wilde's eventual conviction was supported by the 1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act which prohibited sexual relations between men. Prior to the 1885 Amendment, a 1533 statute outlawing “the detestable and abominable vice of buggery” backed the persecution of homosexuals.
			While in an earlier age the “sodomist” had been regarded as a perpetrator of specific, sinful acts, a development in late Victorian pathology saw homosexuality as a new form of criminal degeneracy. According to Michel Foucault, the homosexual male, a deviant individual, emerged as “a type of life, a life form.”
			At the time of the trials, Wilde's homosexuality was an open secret among his contemporaries. This was one significant reason for his treatment as a very controversial public figure. Yet, as a writer he was at the height of his success.
			It was Wilde's affair with Lord Alfred Douglas that triggered the 1895 court trial. Douglas' father, the Marquess of Queensberry, publically accused Wilde, in distinctly inarticulate terms, of 'posing as a Somdomite'(sic). On hearing this, Wilde allegedly wrote to a friend that “my whole life seems ruined by this man.” Wilde proceeded to sue Queensberry for libel.

			'''
			The Trials'''

			The first trial, the libel trial against Queesnberry, took place between the 3rd and 5th of April 1895. In this trial Wilde denied any homosexual activities when cross-examined by Queensberry's lawyer but young men called as witnesses were able to cast doubt on Wilde's truthfulness. As a consequence, Queensberry was acquitted, to public celebration. The public was allowed to attend the trial.
			In the second trial, conducted from 26 April to 1 May 1895, Wilde was accused of “indecency.” Due to Wilde's own rhetoric skill and his lawyer's efforts to the cast doubt on the credibility of witnesses, the jury could not reach a definite decision and a third trial became necessary. Wilde was urged by friends to leave the country in the interval between the 2nd and 3rd trials but he refused to do so.
			The third and last trial took place from 20 May to 25 May 1895. Under a new prosecutor, it ended with Wilde's conviction for “gross indecency” by the commission of acts of indecency in private with members of his own sex. He was convicted to 2 years of imprisonment and hard labor in Reading Goal.
			In all trials the prosecution's focus lay on Wilde's “suspicious” writings, while specifics of his sexual activities were not so much under scrutiny in spite of the fact that it was for these that he was accused.

			'''
			Public Response'''

			After Wilde's conviction, a great number of spiteful, self-righteous newspaper editorials were published. The Daily Telegraph expressed that “the grave of contemptuous oblivion may rest on his [Wilde's] foolish ostentation, his empty paradoxes, his insufferable posturing, his incurably vanity,” and further saw his case as a “terrible warning” for young men in danger of falling victim to the same vices. The London Evening News felt compelled to state that “England has tolerated the man Wilde and others of his kind too long.” Wilde and “his kind” being a threat to “the wholesome, manly, simple ideals of English life.”

			'''Aftermath'''

			Wilde was released from prison in 1897 as a broken man. He went to France where he called himself Sebastian Melmoth after the doomed title character of Charles Maturin's novel “Melmoth the Wanderer.“
			In 1898, he published “The Ballad of Reading Goal.”
			In 1905, 5 years after Wilde's death, a letter of deep reproach to Lord Alfred Douglas was published under the title “De Profundis.“ This letter was originally written during his imprisonment.


			----


			'''sources:'''

			Arata, Stephen. Fictions of Loss in the Victorian Fin de Siecle. Identity and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

			Hyde, H. Montgomery. The Trials of Oscar Wilde. 1948. New York: Dover Publications, 1973. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

			Ousby, Ian, ed. “Oscar Wilde.” The Wordsworth Companion to Literature in English. Wordsworth Reference. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1994.

			Wilpers, Birgit. The Trials of Oscar Wilde. Seminar paper. GRIN Verlag, 2008. Google Books. Web. 25 October 2011.

Pankratz at 09:14, 26 October 2011

2011-10-26T09:14:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 26 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A series of three trials held at the London [[Old ~~Baily~~]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.		A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Bailey]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.

Pankratz at 09:13, 26 October 2011

2011-10-26T09:13:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 26 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Wilde Trials'''~~

	A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Baily]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.		A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Baily]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.

Eleanor rigby: Created page with ''''Wilde Trials''' A series of three trials held at the London Old Baily in 1895 in which Oscar Wilde stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicte…'

2011-10-26T08:20:59Z

Created page with ''''Wilde Trials''' A series of three trials held at the London Old Baily in 1895 in which Oscar Wilde stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicte…'

New page

'''Wilde Trials'''

A series of three trials held at the London [[Old Baily]] in 1895 in which [[Oscar Wilde]] stood accused of homosexuality. Wilde was found guilty and convicted to a two-year prison sentence and hard labor.