Proto-Socialism - Revision history

WikiSysop at 11:49, 23 December 2017

2017-12-23T11:49:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 23 December 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In [[Civil War]] England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from [[religion]], some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].		Label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In [[Civil War]] England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].

	==Religion==		==Religion==

WikiSysop at 11:25, 23 December 2017

2017-12-23T11:25:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 23 December 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Religion==		==Religion==
	Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for [[religious freedom]], which followed the 16th-century [[Reformation]] and Counter-Reformation movements, therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.		Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th-century [[Reformation]] and Counter-Reformation movements, therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.

	==Class conflict==		==Class conflict==

Pankratz at 09:41, 13 December 2011

2011-12-13T09:41:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 13 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Proto-Socialism''' is a label~~ for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In [[Civil War]] England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from [[religion]], some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].		Label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In [[Civil War]] England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from [[religion]], some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].

	==Religion==		==Religion==

Daniel: /* The Army */ important omission.

2009-07-21T20:01:56Z

The Army: important omission.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 21 July 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==The Army==		==The Army==
	The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became ~~adequate~~. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to [[impressment]], that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.		The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became inadequate. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to [[impressment]], that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.

	==Origins of the Levellers==		==Origins of the Levellers==

Daniel: source for the overton quote

2009-07-21T11:57:31Z

source for the overton quote

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 21 July 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==Origins of the Levellers==		==Origins of the Levellers==
	In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', [[Richard Overton]] wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of" ~~[source?]~~. This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread. It was in this context that the [[Levellers]] and later the [[Diggers]] appeared.		In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', [[Richard Overton]] wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of". This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread. It was in this context that the [[Levellers]] and later the [[Diggers]] appeared.

			==Primary Sources==
			* Overton, Richard. ''An arrow against all tyrants and tyranny, shot from the prison of Newgate into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords and all other usurpers and tyrants whatsoever. Wherein the original, rise, extent, and end of magisterial power, the natural and national rights, freedoms and properties of mankind are discovered and undeniably maintained; the late oppressions and encroachments of the Lords over the commons legally (by the fundamental laws and statutes of this realm, as also by a memorable extract out of the records of the Tower of London) condemned; the late Presbyterian ordinance (invented and contrived by the diviners, and by the motion of Mr Bacon and Mr Tate read in the House of Commons) examined, refuted, and exploded, as most inhumane, tyrannical and barbarous.'' London: Private printing, 1646. [http://www.constitution.org/lev/eng_lev_05.htm Online Version]

	==References==		==References==

Pankratz at 08:06, 21 July 2009

2009-07-21T08:06:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 21 July 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	==Class conflict==		==Class conflict==
	The [[Civil War]] being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as [[Ship Money]] further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they ~~Aristocrats~~, ~~Land~~-~~Owners~~ or ~~Merchants~~ saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen ~~or landlord~~ overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky, 1995. 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people ~~then~~ to the ~~Armies~~ commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.		The [[Civil War]] being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as [[Ship Money]] further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they aristocrats, land-owners (who were usually identical with aristocrats) or merchants saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky 1995: 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people than to the Army commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.

	==Economics==		==Economics==
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==The Army==		==The Army==
	The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became ~~adaequate~~. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to [[impressment]], that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.		The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became adequate. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to [[impressment]], that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.

	==Origins of the Levellers==		==Origins of the Levellers==
	In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', [[Richard Overton]] wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread. It was in this context that the [[Levellers]] and later the [[Diggers]] appeared.		In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', [[Richard Overton]] wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of" [source?]. This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread. It was in this context that the [[Levellers]] and later the [[Diggers]] appeared.


Line 20:		Line 20:
	* Hill, Christopher. ''The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution.'' London: Temple Smith, 1972.		* Hill, Christopher. ''The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution.'' London: Temple Smith, 1972.
	* Mendle, Michael (ed). ''The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State.'' Cambridge: CUP, 2001		* Mendle, Michael (ed). ''The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State.'' Cambridge: CUP, 2001
	* Lingard, John. "The Commonwealth" ''A history of England from the first invasion of the Romans to the accession of William & Mary in 1688~~. By John Lingard~~.'' Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2005.		* Lingard, John. "The Commonwealth" ''A history of England from the first invasion of the Romans to the accession of William & Mary in 1688.'' Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2005.
	* Coward, Barry. ''A ~~companion~~ to Stuart Britain.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.		* Coward, Barry. ''A Companion to Stuart Britain.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

Pankratz at 07:16, 21 July 2009

2009-07-21T07:16:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 21 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Religion==		==Religion==
	Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for [[religious freedom]], which followed the 16th ~~Century~~ [[Reformation]] and Counter-Reformation movements, therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.		Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for [[religious freedom]], which followed the 16th-century [[Reformation]] and Counter-Reformation movements, therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.

	==Class conflict==		==Class conflict==
	The [[Civil War]] being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as [[Ship~~'s money~~]] further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they Aristocrats, Land-Owners or Merchants saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen or landlord overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky, 1995. 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people then to the Armies commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.		The [[Civil War]] being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as [[Ship Money]] further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they Aristocrats, Land-Owners or Merchants saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen or landlord overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky, 1995. 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people then to the Armies commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.

	==Economics==		==Economics==

Daniel at 21:23, 17 July 2009

2009-07-17T21:23:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 17 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Proto-Socialism''' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In Civil War England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].		'''Proto-Socialism''' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In [[Civil War]] England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from [[religion]], some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].

	Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th Century Reformation and ~~Counterreformation~~ movements therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.		==Religion==
			Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for [[religious freedom]], which followed the 16th Century [[Reformation]] and Counter-Reformation movements, therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.

	The Civil War being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as Ship's money further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they Aristocrats, Land-Owners or Merchants saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen or landlord overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky, 1995. 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people then to the Armies commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.		==Class conflict==
			The [[Civil War]] being fought against a King deemed tyrannical and milking the country through arbitrary taxation such as [[Ship's money]] further complicated things. While the wealthy elite, be they Aristocrats, Land-Owners or Merchants saw this as their major problem, the lower classes, especially in rural areas more often felt much more exploited by their local noblemen or landlord overcharging them or enclosing the common land. The war aim of the parliamentary army to establish a "true religion, the laws, liberty and peace of the Kingdome" (Petegorsky, 1995. 60) thus had a very different meaning to common people then to the Armies commanders, mostly recruited from the nobility. In fact, the meaning of "liberty" for a landowner was diametrically opposed to that of a peasant working the land.

	The late 1640s then featured a series of devastating harvests, which lead to constantly rising food prices. Additionally the Long Parliament introduced the excise ordinant, essentially a tax on common goods, which disproportionately burdened low-income families. The Civil War had also led to a breakdown of the economy, and what little was left was often taken by looting armies. Furthermore landowners in many cases used the breakdown of authority to their advantage and began enclosing more common land than would have been possible before.		==Economics==
			The late 1640s then featured a series of devastating harvests, which lead to constantly rising food prices. Additionally the [[Long Parliament]] introduced the excise ordinant, essentially a tax on common goods, which disproportionately burdened low-income families. The Civil War had also led to a breakdown of the economy, and what little was left was often taken by looting armies. Furthermore landowners in many cases used the breakdown of authority to their advantage and began enclosing more common land than would have been possible before.

	The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became adaequate. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to impressment, that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.		==The Army==
			The parliamentary soldiers were also disaffected. While in the beginning of the civil war thousands of volunteers joined the armies, by 1643 voluntary service became adaequate. This, and an increase in cases of desertion, led to [[impressment]], that is forcing people to become soldiers. In addition, the rank and file became more and more aware of their difference from their commanders, which were mostly noblemen or otherwise of high status. This and the constantly late payments of soldiers led both to mutiny and the easy spreading of proto-socialist ideas in the military.

	In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', Richard Overton wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread.		==Origins of the Levellers==
			In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', [[Richard Overton]] wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread. It was in this context that the [[Levellers]] and later the [[Diggers]] appeared.

Daniel: Undo revision 2554 by Daniel (Talk)

2009-07-17T20:50:18Z

Undo revision 2554 by Daniel (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 17 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''Proto-Socialism'' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In Civil War England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].		'''Proto-Socialism''' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In Civil War England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].

	Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th Century Reformation and Counterreformation movements therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.		Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th Century Reformation and Counterreformation movements therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.
Line 10:		Line 10:

	In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', Richard Overton wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread.		In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', Richard Overton wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread.


			==References==
			* Hill, Christopher. ''The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution.'' London: Temple Smith, 1972.
			* Mendle, Michael (ed). ''The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State.'' Cambridge: CUP, 2001
			* Lingard, John. "The Commonwealth" ''A history of England from the first invasion of the Romans to the accession of William & Mary in 1688. By John Lingard.'' Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2005.
			* Coward, Barry. ''A companion to Stuart Britain.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

Daniel at 20:49, 17 July 2009

2009-07-17T20:49:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 17 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Proto-Socialism''' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In Civil War England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].		''Proto-Socialism'' is a label for a number of left-wing ideas concerning the contemporary and ideal future state of society. In Civil War England a number of groups became known, which could be grouped under this label. Some of them derived their radical political ideas from religion, some of them were completely a-religious. The best known of these were the [[Levellers]] and the [[Diggers]].

	Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th Century Reformation and Counterreformation movements therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.		Religion in the 1600s still had an all-encompassing role, it formed the set of values which sanctioned more or less all social practices. This was especially true in rural areas of Britain. The call for religious freedom, which followed the 16th Century Reformation and Counterreformation movements therefore was implicitly also a questioning of the existing social order, of received hierarchies and ideologies beyond the religious realm.
Line 10:		Line 10:

	In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', Richard Overton wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread.		In one of the first petitions to parliament ''A remonstrance of many thousand citizens...'', Richard Overton wrote in 1646: "Ye are rich and abound in goods and have need of nothing; but the afflictions of the poor — your hunger-starved brethren — ye have no compassion of." This, in condensed form, stated the common belief that the upper classes fought this war for their self-interest and saw the common men as mere tools in their schemes, not as fellow citizens worthy of respect and a loaf of bread.


	~~==References==~~
	* Hill, Christopher. ''The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution.'' London: Temple Smith, 1972.
	* Mendle, Michael (ed). ''The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State.'' Cambridge: CUP, 2001
	* Lingard, John. "The Commonwealth" ''A history of England from the first invasion of the Romans to the accession of William & Mary in 1688. By John Lingard.'' Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2005.
	* Coward, Barry. ''A companion to Stuart Britain.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.