Licensing - Revision history

WikiSysop at 10:22, 26 May 2011

2011-05-26T10:22:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 26 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the [[Civil War]] and [[Commonwealth]], there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".		If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the [[Civil War]] and [[Commonwealth]], there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. [[John Milton]] argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".

	During the [[Exclusion Crisis]], due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.		During the [[Exclusion Crisis]], due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.

Daniel at 09:42, 17 July 2009

2009-07-17T09:42:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 17 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the Civil War and Commonwealth, there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".		If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the [[Civil War]] and [[Commonwealth]], there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".

	During the [[Exclusion Crisis]], due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.		During the [[Exclusion Crisis]], due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.

WikiSysop at 01:31, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T01:31:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 10 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the Civil War and Commonwealth, there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".		If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the Civil War and Commonwealth, there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".

	During the Exclusion Crisis, due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.		During the [[Exclusion Crisis]], due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.

Pankratz at 15:42, 26 June 2009

2009-06-26T15:42:06Z

New page

If one wanted to publish a text, usually a license was needed. Getting a license also meant: submitting the text to be published to censorship. In the Civil War and Commonwealth, there was a heated debate about whether this should be continued. John Milton argued in ''Areopagitica'' (1644) that "who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were, in the eye".

During the Exclusion Crisis, due to the inability (or unwillingness) of Parliament to vote on anything else but Exclusion, the Licensing Act lapsed (i.e. it was not renewed). The result was a spate of pamphlets, books, ballads, poems. The Licensing Act was renewed in 1685 and lapsed again (this time for good) in 1695. Jürgen Habermas and others see this as the beginning of a critical public sphere in England.